☰ Intellectual Property Law in China

Intellectual Property Law in China

by Sheldon Zhao


Overview


Intellectual property (IP) 知识产权 protection in People’s Republic of China (PRC) first emerged in the 1980s, as part of the Reform and Open Up movement 改革开放. The newly budding market economy required the country to implement IP protection for both domestic business and trade.

From the 1980s to early 2000s,  Chinese IP regulations were very loosely defined and poorly implemented. Such a copyleft environment gave rise to large industries of piracy in China. In 2004, 90% of all music CDs, movie DVDs, and computer programs in China were pirated. Also, fake brands and pirated DVD could be found at almost every store and every street corner. In 1999, a famous case between Microsoft and Yadu Technology, a company that provided pirated Microsoft Operating System for its employees, was ruled against Microsoft by a court in Beijing. In another key case, Microsoft v. Shenzhen reflective materials institute, the defendant copied 650,000 Microsoft Holograms. Although they were found guilty, the court only imposed a fine of just over 250USD - far from Microsoft's estimated loss of 30 million USD. These examples demonstrate how early Chinese IP laws fail to provide enough IP protection, fails to enforce specific legislation, and fails to punish the infringing party. 

This environment came at a time when the cost of Microsoft OS was 2000RMB - which would be a decent monthly salary for an office worker. In another famous case, Microsoft v. Gongruan Software Inc., the largest distributor of pirated Microsoft Operating System in China, the responsible parties were fined over 8.7 million RMB (over 1 million USD) and sentenced to jail under administrative regulations. This case incited huge repercussions among Chinese internet users, as a survey showed that 88% of the population supported the defendant and their action. This was a key reason why IP protection in China came about very slowly.

Pirated Books
×

Since the 21st century, however, the landscape has been changing. As the Chinese economy joined the global market and boomed at an impressive rate, the government faced more pressure to provide more comprehensive IPR. After joining the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, China became a signature of TRIPS and other international IP agreements, starting to expand and enforce IP protection drastically. The government revised the existing laws and announced many administrative regulations - all of which aimed to provide a better environment for economic growth. Under such a growth-driven methodology, the knockoff/pirate market slowly dwindled; music streaming services are taking over illegal downloading; technology companies are filing patents at a historic rate. According to a report by the World Bank in 2017, Chinese IP laws are currently in line with international standards.

Related Legal and Government Terms

IP Protection in China constitutes of laws, administrative regulations and department rules.

The laws are drafted and passed by the National People's Congress 人民代表大会. The framework laws of IPR in PRC include Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China 中华人民共和国著作权法, Patent Law of the People's Republic of China 中华人民共和国专利法, and Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China 中华人民共和国商标法. These three laws construct a solid frame work that covers most IP-related issues.

Copyright Law of People's Republic China
Patent Law of People's Republic China
Trademark Law of People's Republic China

The administrative regulations are proposed and announced by the State Council 国务院. These regulations usually respond to the new frontiers of IP discussion. Past administrative regulations have dealt with issues such as computer programs, genome, and more.

Department regulations embody specific regulations put forward by different related government agencies. They are more detailed laws that provide more specified information on IP regulations such as punishment, exemptions, and more. Important related government agencies that issue department regulations include:

sipo

State Intellectual Property Office

国家知识产权局

SIPO

Domestically, SIPO deals primarily with Patent Protection and handles patent applications. Internationally, SIPO coordinating domestic foreign-related IPR issues involving copyrights, trademarks, and patents.

saic

State Administration on Industry and Commerce

国家工商行政管理总局 

SAIC

SAIC deals with all commercial issues in China. The Trade Office under SAIC is in charge of trademark registration and enforcement for domestic and international companies.

ncac

National Copyright Administration of China

国家版权局

NCAC

The NCAC manages all domestic copyright issues such as copyright enforcement, copyright infringement investigations, and copyright regulations adjustments.

This website provides a brief overview of Intellectual Property Law in China, both past and present. It dives into the three major pillars of IP Law, and provides some foundational information regarding each category.

Patent.


Patent law is the most heated area of IPR in China. Historically, nations such as the US have accused China of safe-harboring patent infringement to benefit domestic economic growth. Patent Law of the People's Republic of China was first introduced in China in 1985. Over decades, it has also gone through multiple revisions under pressure from the US (1992) and the WTO. (2001) Unlike America, there are three types of Chinese patent. The inventive patent corresponds to the US utility patent, and the design patent corresponds to the US design patent. There is also a third type called utility model patent, which requires less inventive power than a regular utility patent. Patent law in China also delineates situations where patents cannot be applied, such as for disease treatment. 

Details

Types of Patent:

Inventive patent, utility model patent (UMP), and design patent

Protected Items:

  1. scientific discoveries;
  2. rules and methods for intellectual activities;
  3. methods for the diagnosis or treatment of diseases;
  4. animal or plant varieties;
  5. substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation; and
  6. designs that are mainly used for marking the pattern, color or the combination of the two of prints.

Criteria of Ineligibility:

  1. scientific discoveries;
  2. rules and methods for intellectual activities;
  3. methods for the diagnosis or treatment of diseases;
  4. animal or plant varieties;
  5. substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation; and
  6. designs that are mainly used for marking the pattern, color or the combination of the two, of prints.

Term of Protection:

UMP and design patents: 10 years since day of registration.

Inventive patents: 20 years since day of registration.

Application Process:

All filing require an official application. For inventive patents, SIPO will to review any application and request to examine the original object within 3 years of application.

Trademark.


Trademark infringement is perhaps the most notorious of all stereotypical Chinese IP violations. The flourishing counterfeit market of "luxury handbags" and "designer clothing" became an emblem of the rampant trademark violations in China. The truth is, China has established a series of strict regulations for trademarks. Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China was the first ever IP law passed in PRC. Drafted in 1983, the law reflected the burgeoning market economy in 1980s China. The SAIC provides a fairly efficient system for dealing with trademark violations. However, the sheer scale of the country and the flourishing e-commerce community have made law enforcement extremely difficult.

Details

Protected Item:

Any visual sign capable of distinguishing the goods or service of one natural person, legal entity or any other organization from that of others, including any word, design, letters of an alphabet, numerals, three-dimensional symbol, combinations of colors, and their combination.

Criteria for a Well-Known Mark:

  1. reputation of the mark to the relevant public;
  2. time for continued use of the mark;
  3. consecutive time, extent and geographical area of advertisement of the mark;
  4. records of protection of the mark as a well-known mark; and
  5. any other factors relevant to the reputation of the mark.

Criteria for Ineligibility:

  1. those identical with or similar to the State name, national flag, national emblem, military flag, or decorations, of the People’s Republic of China, with names of the places where the Central and State organs are located, or with the names and designs of landmark buildings;
  2. those identical with or similar to the State names, national flags, national emblems or military flags of foreign countries, except that the foreign state government agrees otherwise on the use;
  3. those identical with or similar to the names, flags or emblems or names, of international intergovernmental organizations, except that the organizations agree otherwise on the use or that it is not easy for the use to mislead the public;
  4. those identical with or similar to official signs and hallmarks, showing official control or warranty by them, except that the use thereof is otherwise authorized;
  5. those identical with or similar to the symbols, or names, of the Red Cross or the Red Crescent;
  6. those having the nature of discrimination against any nationality;
  7. those having the nature of exaggeration and fraud in advertising goods;
  8. those detrimental to socialist morals or customs, or having other unhealthy influences;Œ
  9. those only comprising generic names, designs or models of the goods in respect of which the trademarks are used;
  10. those having direct reference to the quality, main raw materials, function, use, weight, quantity or other features of the goods in respect of which the trademarks are used; and
  11. those lacking distinctive features.

Infringement:

  1. to use a trademark that is identical with or similar to a registered trademark in respect of the identical or similar goods without the authorization from the trademark registrant;
  2. to sell goods that he knows bear a counterfeited registered trademark;
  3. to counterfeit, or to make, without authorization, representations of a registered trademark of another person, or to sell such representations of a registered trademark as were counterfeited, or made without authorization;
  4. to replace, without the consent of the trademark registrant, its or his registered trademark and market again the goods bearing the replaced trademark; or
  5. to cause, in other respects, prejudice to the exclusive right of another person to use a registered trademark.

Damages:

  1. the trademark owner’s actual loss;
  2. the benefits gained by the infringer from the infringement;
  3. a multiple of the royalty for the relevant trademark licence; or
  4. statutory damages of less than 3 million RMB.

What Next?


In recent years, China has attempted to make it into the tier of high-income countries through developing its technology industry. The government has attempted to stimulate growth in the tech industry by providing better IP protection to stimulate innovation. The continuation of the growth-oriented approach to IP law has driven China into a new phase of IP development. According to WIPO, China is currently filing more patents than any other nation, and the trend is not stopping. Scholars have noticed a close link between this patent boom and the development of Chinese economy at large. At a moment of economic transition, Chinese tech industry is producing immense momentum for the economy.

July 2017, Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke at a Chinese Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission meeting. In his speech, he emphasized the importance of IP protection in fostering a healthy domestic market. He stated his vision for the future of IP Laws in PRC: increasing protection for new fields, and harsh punishment for infringers. Through these measurements, China hopes to not only regulate the domestic market but also to attract foreign capital. They hope that companies who used to find themselves taken advantage of while doing business with China can now feel confident to invest in China, helping with the economic opening up 经济开放 of PRC. 

The Global opinion of Chinese IPR has bettered in the past decade. This, however, does not mean criticism has ceased. The United States, a longstanding critique of Chinese IPR, continues to attack the country for its IP regime. According to a February 2017 report released by US Chamber of Commerce, the primary issues with Chinese IP Laws are "historic and growing levels of IP infringement, as well as challenges in the ability of IP owners to secure adequate remedies for infringement." Although the ranking is expected to rise, the report still conveys a sense that Chinese IP environment has greatly disadvantaged US companies. They have keenly noticed that implementation of IP laws in China is largely uneven and local courts tend to favor local industries. Such bureaucracy has made it hard for US companies to file patents, register trademarks, and fight infringement in China.

President Trump's Tweet on Trade War with China

March 2018, US and China entered a trade war. President Trump, in one of his Tweets, suggested that future trade negotiations with China will also hopefully take down some of the IP barriers that have stood between the two countries. Chinese foreign policy commentators called such notion “Washington's IP paranoia.” In response to such accusation, China has launched a nationwide initiative called "Made in China 2025". By 2025, China hopes to give the phrase "Made in China" a new meaning, one that emphasizes innovation and creativity. The government's plan is one of Chinese technological dominance in the world, which has, in turn, doubled down on the government's desire to construct a better IP regime. One way or another, China's growth-oriented approach to IP laws have served them justice in the past. We have every reason to believe that China will continue to broaden IP protection, to increase IP law enforcement, and to use IPR to stimulate innovation. These acts, if all goes according to plan, will make China the king of the information world. But our world is too volatile for our imagination.

Contact.


Do you want us to style your home? Fill out the form and fill me in with the details :) We love meeting new people!

Sources


习近平:营造稳定公平透明的营商环境 加快建设开放型经济新体制: http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-07/17/c_1121333722.htm

微软:想反盗版不容易: http://ip.people.com.cn/GB/10303774.html

关于《中华人民共和国著作权法修正案(草案)》的说明: http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2010-05/10/content_1580444.htm

中国知识产权法学的产生与发展综述: http://www.iolaw.org.cn/showArticle.aspx?id=2603

中国商标法的沿革——现代知识产权法律法规汇编: http://www.law-lib.com/flsz/sz_view.asp?no=2277

Outline of the Legal and Regulatory Framework for Intellectual Property in the People's Republic of China (PRC): http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/outline/cn.html

THE FUTURE OF MUSIC AND FILM PIRACY IN CHINA: http://btlj.org/data/articles2015/vol21/21_2/21-berkeley-tech-l-j-0795-0872.pdf

Overview of Chinese Patent Law: http://www.ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/China_Overview_ChinesePatentLaw_Sept20040425.pdf

Trademark procedures and strategies: China: http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Intelligence/Yearbook/2017/Country-chapters/China

Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (2010): https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Copyright_Law_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China_(2010)

Patent Law of the People's Republic of China: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/cn/cn028en.pdf

Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China: http://english.gov.cn/archive/laws_regulations/2014/08/23/content_281474983043626.htm

Chinese President Xi Jinping says infringers should be punished and pay a heavy price: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/07/23/chinese-president-xi-jinping-says-infringers-punished-pay-heavy-price/id=85953/

Made in China 2025 Initiative at Center of Growing IP Tensions Between United States and China: http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/04/23/made-in-china-2025-initiative-ip-tensions/id=95762/

This Website is Made Possible by w3.css